Monday, January 29, 2007

The Power of the Qu'ove Revolution




In response to a friend’s blog: MilkyWai’s vs. Butterfingers

I proudly present in all of my Quivering silliness poetry from the Dead Bird Society!

As I look into the sky today
And there I see the Milky Way
I am a MAZED I don't Catch it as my Quartz lingers!
You see; the Dodo's wings are truly butterfingers.

Perhaps like the infinite number of Martin Chowns
We have here a Dodo acting as a silly Clown
One day the Green spot will meet the Red spot
That'll be the day when we'll know if Christ is or Not

A Dodo Baptist I once was; of what clan am I now?
The clan that wants to show the Way of Qu'ove; and how?
Through the same Qu'ove as the one... I see hangin' on!
With his fingertips to a Cross... going wheeeee I Won!!
Through the roads of Colorado... exclaimin' I'm alive!
The Quiverin dodo feathers... a dancin' n doin' the Jive!

Whether I understand or know my peception and reality
I do the Qu'ove dance that's not to everyday normality
I ponder if I'm by Divine Creation or Charlie's Evolution
This Dodo chooses his last flight by the Qu'ove Revolution.

To stretch his imagination beyond the Zee and the Qudos
He'll go with the Endless Yes of the now existin' Dodos
Carrying the Gospel of Qu'ove to the ones Extinctified
Just as did the King of Humanity who was once Crucified.

Oh through the same Qu'ove as the one... I see hangin' on!
With his fingertips to a Cross... going wheeeee I Won!!
Through the roads of Colorado... exclaimin' I'm a live!
The Quiverin dodo feathers... a dancin' n doin' the Jive!



May the Power of the Qu’ove be with You!
This blog is dedicated to all my Mystabewildered blogging friends.


Comments from Yahoo 360

(6 total)

o my Quiet Heavens, U have more than 2 Mystabewilder'ed friends?

U R a Lucky Man!

Sunday 28 January 2007 - 10:25PM (CST)

Well I don't know to be honest... it depends how many willing dead birds I can find!

Wednesday 31 January 2007 - 12:36AM (GMT)


define dead...

Tuesday 30 January 2007 - 07:44PM (CST)

Dead as in... willing to be dead to the world, dead to insults and hatred, dead to religions, dead to conformity, dead to jealousy, dead to competition, material wealth and greed, dead to perfectionism, dead to selfishness, and so on...

but Alive as in willing to be alive to the creative human mind and the imagination, alive to the exploration of endless possibilities, alive to the acceptance of facts and knowledge, alive to the continuous path of learning "down the road less travelled", alive to the awareness of all that is going on, alive to the genorosity of the soul and spirit, alive to unselfishness, alive to simplicity and individual freedom, alive to experience happiness, alive to compassion and caring, alive to the power of forgiveness, alive to the cause of humanity, alive to humanity's responsibilities as guardian of earth, alive to fun and laughter, and above all things alive to the power of Qu'ove...

Do you care enough to join the Qu'ove Revolution???

Wednesday 31 January 2007 - 08:12AM (GMT)

damn...is that a dashboard Jesus you've got there?

Thursday 1 February 2007 - 02:18PM (CST)

Uhmm.... that's my Dad I think...

Saturday 3 February 2007 - 01:37AM (GMT)

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Why I’m still talking to Elvis


By way of background for this blog:-


Lapis Lazuli asked some very interesting fundamental questions in her blog just recently as follows:


Where were you before you were born, where do you go after death. Please tell me what you think, not what they told you to think. Deep in your head you have your own opinion. Share it with me. You see, we have no proof. The closest of a proof is near death experience. In near death experience, the soul is still connected to the body while the spirit got yanked out of the body. Because the soul is still connected, it is near death but not death.
How come we don't remember before birth, where do we come from. Who are we without a human body...

It has generated and still is as of this present time generating a lot of responses.

My humble response was:

I've spent 40 years looking for the answers so far and I'm still working on it. The closest I've got is that I'm currently communicating with Einstien and Elvis. The last time I went to see a medium I was told that my grandfather was saying I needed a good slapping on the cheeks.

To which another reader Kim replied:

Okay...right off the bat..I want to talk to you Phil....your in touch with Elvis...OMG!!! :) Please tell him about me...lol....

She also said:

I believe with all my heart...our souls live forever...we never die. We may leave this vessel behind and rightly so for in some cases...it is not a good vessel...betrays us often. I believe we are pure energy. My own made up theory...let's call it *Kim's Theory* is if we knew what lay ahead waiting for us after death....we would never want to be here on earth. But sadly we need this life to progress....to further our growth. It is here that we learn, or shall I say progress and in some of our cases, digress. I believe when we leave here that the beauty we will experience will be indescribable....we cannot begin to fathom. I had a dream once...I experienced what true unconditional love was like....in it's purest state...and I wrote a story only the story seemed show shallow to me.....the words did not describe what I saw nor what I felt. Even the way that I communicated in this dream was so different, so unlike us. I spoke but not with words...with thoughts but with minds...looking into eyes.

It was the most moving experience I ever had...and to this day, I carry it close. I know that there is something greater for us....and I believe that once we arrive to whence we began....we will be once again home and once again...we will be loved.


I think Kim’s theory is lovely and I like it… I hope to what ever created us that it’s right!

So back to my original question; why am I still talking to Elvis?


You could ask my psychiatrist at the Shanghai’s IDD (Institute for the Dangerously Deranged) but never mind his theory I’ll tell you why:-

It’s simple he was couriered to me in error by one of my Yahoo 360 blogging friends Sai. She was supposed to be sending Elvis back to another of her blogging friends Psychotic Dave. As a result I blogged about it last month in ‘You Dolt!’ – for her careless error I had called Sai a ‘trollop’ which became my careless error but that’s another story altogether.

You will see from this blog that I have ABSOLUTE proof that I am talking to Elvis with the LARGE photo of me and Elvis together. This was taken in Shanghai in December 2006. Some say that it don’t look like him – but hey don’t you know that they have better access to radical facial surgery on the otherside than here and if that’s the way Elvis wants to look these days who am I to stop him?

Besides, I have to frequently endure his frequent singing of the blues in the living room of our apartment and for that you will frequently find me hurling outrageous insults at the King and if it’s not to the King then it’s to my Moon… It may be because I’m shouting these insults rather than due to my claim that I’m still talking to Elvis that I’m seeing a psychiatrist at the IDD, I’m not really sure... hhmmm, it could even be because of my over frequent tendency to use the word frequently.

If you’re still not satisfied that I’m really talking to Elvis well then let me at least mention to you an article in today’s Daily Telegraph (a source from which I have plagiarized most of my blogs (well about two of them actually).

I was gonna plagiarized this one and make it my own Shining Glory but I’m well… you know with my testosterone levels on the rapid decline… I’ve developed an increasingly emotional side to my character and I’m still reeling from the hurt caused by the anonymous comment that had been made (you know I'm joking don't you?).

So here’s the article by Marcus Chown (what a name huh?) in TODAY’S (that’s 16th January 2007) Daily Telegraph.

It's official, Elvis lives


It might sound a little crazy, but our standard theories of cosmology and physics suggest that an infinite number of Presleys still exist, says Marcus Chown. And if that's not scary enough, it also means that you, and these words, are repeated ad infinitum across the universe
Elvis is alive. No, really! He didn't die of a cardiac arrest in his bathroom at Graceland on August 16, 1977. Instead, he slipped out of the back door under cover of darkness dressed as a nun, had a sex change and worked for several years in a gas station in Ohio. She/he has now retired, is living on the Gulf Coast and is in tip-top health. After all, she's still only 71.

Have I done a David Icke and gone conspiracy mad? Not at all. Elvis is alive and kicking, all right. Not here on Earth - but in an infinite number of other places in the universe. I have just revealed cosmology's dirty little secret – the thing the people who spend their time theorising about the universe rarely like to mention except in a whisper. And who can honestly blame them?

Elvis's survival turns out to be an unavoidable consequence of two things – the standard theory of cosmology and the standard theory of physics, "quantum theory". Take cosmology first.

According to the standard picture, the universe underwent a brief, super-fast period of expansion in its first split-second of existence. It goes by the name of "inflation". You don't need to know much about inflation – what drove it or why cosmologists believe it happened. You just need to know one thing: inflation implies the universe goes on for ever – it is effectively infinite in extent.

The universe we see through our telescopes, however, does not look infinite. Far from it. Everything burst into being 13.7 billion years ago in the explosion of the Big Bang, so we see only the galaxies whose light has taken less than 13.7 billion years to get to us.
Galaxies whose light would take, say 14.7 billion years, we don't see – their light is still on its way to Earth. For this reason, there is a "light horizon" around our bit of the universe and everything we can see within it we call the "observable universe".

But, just as there is more beyond the horizon at sea, there is more of the universe beyond its horizon. In fact, an infinite amount, according to inflation. Imagine our observable universe shrunk to the size of a soap bubble. Well, according to inflation, beyond our soap bubble are an infinite number of other soap bubbles, all similar to our observable universe.

It is easy to speculate on what it is like in the other bubble regions because we have a pretty good idea how the galaxies in the observable universe came to be. Some regions of the Big Bang fireball were ever-so-slightly denser than others. They acted as "seeds" for the growth of galaxies.

Specifically, they had stronger gravity than surrounding regions and so gathered in matter from about them. This made their gravity even stronger so they could pull in more matter. In a process akin to the rich getting ever richer, they gradually produced the galaxies like our own Milky Way and its neighbour, Andromeda.

Now, inflation is no airy-fairy theoretical idea. It has been pretty much confirmed in the past year by data collected by Nasa's "Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe", which is observing the dim "afterglow" of the Big Bang fireball from far out in space. And inflation predicts more than that – there are an infinite number of bubble regions like our observable universe.

It also predicts something else significant – that the seeds of galaxies were randomly scattered throughout the Big Bang fireball. Consequently, in the next soap-bubble region to our own, the seeds were different, which means that the history of that region was different, and the galaxies that formed were not the same as ours. And the same goes for the next region. And the next...

Though Elvis has not made a look in yet, don't worry, we're getting there!
The last thing you need to know to understand why the King still lives is that the universe is quantum. This means that, ultimately, everything comes in tiny, indivisible grains, or "quanta". Matter comes in indivisible grains. Time comes in indivisible grains. And so does space.

If we could look at space with some kind of super-microscope – way beyond the power of any instrument we can build today – it would resolve itself into a grid of tiny cubes. For the sake of simplicity, think of it instead as the two-dimensional grid of squares of a chessboard.
In this picture, we might have a galaxy-spawning seed of matter on one square, and another seed on another square; and so on. But, and this is the key, there are only a finite number of ways of arranging the seeds just as there are only a finite number of ways of arranging the pieces on a chessboard.

So there are only a finite number of possible histories for a universe leading to only a finite number of possible arrangements of galaxies.
If your head hasn't yet exploded, you now have all you need to understand the first paragraph of this article.

If there are an infinite number of regions like our observable universe but only a finite number of histories for such regions, then every possible history happens not once but an infinite number of times.

"There are an infinite number of places in the universe where Elvis is alive and kicking," says one of the contributors to inflation theory, Alex Vilenkin of Tufts University.

There are also an infinite number of places where Shane Warne was born in Surrey, and England never lose the Ashes. There are an infinite number of places where The Telegraph liked this article so much it decided to pay me a million pounds and run a special colour supplement solely to advertise my new book.

But all of this also has implications for you, not just Elvis and Shane Warne. There are an infinite number of regions in the universe exactly the same as the observable universe. And each contains a perfect copy of you who, up until this instant, has experienced everything you have ever experienced. This is no fanciful prediction.

"It is possible to calculate precisely how far away is the nearest region identical to our observable universe," says Vilenkin.

"It's 10^10^100 centimetres away." (10^100 is 1 followed by 100 zeroes, so I'll leave to imagine how "vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big" 10^ (10^100) is, to steal Douglas Adams's words. As an anorak aside, Google, the name of the ubiquitous web search engine, is a misspelling of "Googol", which means 10^100. There is even a name for 10^Googol – 1 followed by a Googol of zeroes. A "Googolplex"!).

And remember, the existence of your doppelgangers is an unavoidable consequence of our standard theory of cosmology and our standard theory of physics. Your doubles do not exist only if one or both of these theories is wrong, which very few physicists are – frankly - prepared to countenance.

I have a soft spot for this whole idea because, even if you think this is the dullest and most incomprehensible article you have ever read, I can console myself with the thought that, in an infinite number of other space domains, you were so impressed that you emailed it to every person in your address book and bought copies of my book for all your friends and family.

• Marcus Chown's book, 'The Never-Ending Days of Being Dead: Dispatches from the Frontline of Science' is published by Faber & Faber on 18 January, 2007 and is available for £13.99 (rrp £15.99) + £1.25 p&p. To order call Telegraph Books on 0870 428 4112

Finally to our Kim mentioned early on in this blog; I hope I have sufficiently satisfied your insatiable appetite for news on your dearly beloved Elvis and that everything is now clear as mud to you.

Incidentally, for those of you who faithfully read the entire article above: well done! Did you notice how similar Marcus's sense of humour was to mine? Hey, just a minute! What if he's another me in disguise? Perhaps he's from another part of the universe where he in fact goes by the name Philip Turner and where he come's from the technology is so advanced he's able to go to many of the other places in this universe to sell his book... or is it my book? Oh hell this is frightening!!!

If you felt that any part of this blog was plagiarized there's a free helpline number you can call to report the crime: 800-666-PLAGUERIZE

Alternatively, if you feel you've found a crank please call Shanghai's IDD on 021-688861XX they have some very good psychiatrists who may be able to help him.

May the thing that's created us all bless you. Have a great day.


Comments from Yahoo 360

(14 total)

Phil....what can I say...wow..I am totally speechless. You know just this thing exactly is the beauty of 360 and the internet, sharing ideas. I watched a program this past year called What the Bleep do We Know...about just that Quantam physics...it was mind boggling to say the least and up until this minute, I didn't put two and two together. Elvis is alive....never died did he? It is hard to retrain our conditioned thinking processes to digest all this information but so, so very interesting and intruiguing.

You have truly made my day...and thank you Phil, thank you very kindly for posting such a lovely, comedic and informative blog. By the way, I awoke this morning, made my coffee and came to get your message and I am happy to report, I am going to sit outside with my cup of coffee and share a moment or two with the King...just he and I and billions of other everlasting particles. I am thinking that Winston Churchill may show up for a cup also!

Tuesday 16 January 2007 - 07:13AM (EST)


Oh yeah and by the way Phil...awesome Elvis photo...hope you don't mind, I'm taking it...I don't have this one !!!

Tuesday 16 January 2007 - 07:14AM (EST)

You are hilarious my Dear! X

Thursday 18 January 2007 - 11:11AM (GMT)


Phil ~ Just for your info.....Elvis took a shower with me this morning....it was really nice!!! :) :)

Thursday 18 January 2007 - 09:33AM (EST)

Wowweeee!! Kim you lucky gal!

Saturday 20 January 2007 - 04:16AM (GMT)


Reading the Telegraph article I get the impression a number of quantum physicists must have read the same comics that I did when I was a boy. Now they are claiming credit for ideas they have stolen from the Justice League of America, and episodes of Star Trek and The Twilight Zone. Naughty quantum physicists!

Could parallel universes with multiple copies of us all truly exist? I’m not the man to ask...but it does strike me that that kind of duplication of matter and energy seems terribly wasteful. Maybe there are no laws of energy conservation in the Multiverse? Hmmmm.

Saturday 20 January 2007 - 04:40AM (EST)

wow, you really do read a lot!

btw, i know somebody who said they still haven't gotten around to reading this, but will soon!

Saturday 20 January 2007 - 06:13AM (CST)

As I understand it these alternate universes are constantly splitting off from the main branch. Every time I turn left instead of right an alternative universe where I did go right springs into existence. And the alternate universes would spawn yet more realities as our duplicates made their own decisions. If that were true I wonder what the point of that might be in the larger scheme of things? What does it say about my place in the universe if I don't know if I'm the original or the economy pack. My gut reaction to all this is that it makes great Sci-Fi but I just don't believe it is true - I truly believe that I am unique, as is the world - the universe even - that I live in.

Saturday 20 January 2007 - 02:48PM (GMT)

Roo & Sci-Fi Janet, thanks for the comments. Sorry i'm late in replying. I agree that it does seem wasteful to have such duplication in the multiverse. It bothers me that we seem to be able to invent maths fo fit any kind of behaviour. Scientists always get excited when they are able to get consistent results for a theory from at least two completely independent ideas. Now they are getting excited because they can look at the map of the big bang after-glow and create some interesting maths that predicts that there must be an infinite number of universes similar to ours and since there are an infinite number then there must be some that are absolutely indentical which leads to the logical conclusion that we also exist elsewhere.

It's a totally ridiculous thought that only seems acceptable when we think of infinity as a reality. We live in a life where everything seems to have a beginning and an end, so infinity is not a concept that we can really ever fully appreciate.

Even though one might predict that the next nearest identical universe is only 10^10^100 cm away, that only says that the matter arrangement in that universe might be identical to ours. May be even life would evolve on an identical earth and create humankind in exactly the same way. But have not scientist shown that even if our make up from one human to another is 99.99% identical (say as in identical twins) each twin has completely independent thoughts that are totally different from each other.

Thus I agree with Sci-Fi Janet that we are still very unique. Until that is you start looking at an infinite number of these identical universes... something that our tiny finite minds cannot ever really appreciate.

Tuesday 23 January 2007 - 03:26PM (GMT)

We all know Elvis isn't dead. He's just gone home. That's what Tommy Lee Jones said anyway.

Tuesday 23 January 2007 - 06:52PM (GMT)


i checked through deductive reasoning... U R Not Marcus Chown... U'r Accents are different.. However, lurking around in this endless internet society, i did come across an interesting idea that maybe U'r name isn't really Phil Turner...


I think it is conseQuently PAGE Turner .....

Saturday 27 January 2007 - 07:31PM (CST)

okay Phil, exception noted. I do have one little question, since you seem to be particularly knowledgeable about Elvis..who is buried in his tomb?

Thursday 1 February 2007 - 02:16PM (CST)

Let me just go and ask Elvis... wait one moment Cosmo...

Saturday 3 February 2007 - 02:39AM (GMT)


Right yeah... I've just spoken with the King and he says it's himself! He says he's dead alive! That's why he's joined my Dead Bird Society.

Saturday 3 February 2007 - 02:42AM (GMT)

Monday, January 15, 2007

To plagiarize or Not to plagiarize



I was unlucky enough this weekend to be caught with my trousers down.

A reader to my last blog, let’s just call her L commented that I had more or less copied from her article and just changed the wording a bit.

Fair dos! I’ve committed the classic of writers’ sins – plagiarism. Who hasn’t at one time or another? Well, it is January and far too early in the year to be exercising my tired quartz and dipping into the deep wells of my quirky imagination for originality. L suggested that at least I should have cited the source.

I have no Qualms with that and in fact have taken the liberty to go a step further by taking away the ghastly plagiarized text and replaced it entirely with the original work in quotes. The bits that I didn’t plagiarize I’ve left as it is so that at least I can show my half-wit in all its glory.

L commented anonymously and claimed to be the author of the original work. I consider it Quite unlikely that L was the author of the work in question with good intuitive reasoning. Far more likely is that the anonymous reader had clicked on one of my feeds on the front page and came across the article I used for the blog. I strongly suspect also that she is on my friends list and had recently heaped praised for me.

All I can say is sorry L whoever you may actually be… I won’t do it again… promise… well not exactly promise actually but I will be more careful next time at least to ensure what I do has more of the me-ness than of the writer from whom I may source the material.

My good friend Albert Einstein (more about him in a later blog) said:

"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."

It seems then that if Albert is honest enough to admit to some plagiarizing and get away with it then I ought not to hang my head too lowly in shame.

And what about the Bard? Here’s a man from whom I take great inspiration. Did he not commit plagiarism? According to Michael J Cummings he didn’t – Did Shakespeare Plagiarize? But that is just his opinion. The Bard was like you and me, ordinarily human. In his day, his plays didn’t have anything like the fame that they enjoy today.

Since I’m a nearly extinct dodo anyway and probably carrying some kind of avian flu – then watch out if you should dare to point out my faults! I might just plague-rise YOU!!


Comments from Yahoo 360

(7 total)

Hey Phil, everyone steals a little bit of this and that from each other on here, isnt that what its all about....sharing?

Monday 15 January 2007 - 10:02AM (GMT)

did you receive personal gain and/or were there any royalties stiffed in this heroic effort of yours to borrow something from a friend on your List and repost it so that all of us leftBrained RightThinkers could appreciate it more than what was obviously NOT noteworthy enuf 2 repost the original????

its kinda like she wrote the book and you are writing the script for the movie!

i think U Rock, you PlagueRizing Bird Phlue U!

Monday 15 January 2007 - 11:55PM (CST)

I agree with you Annwyl.

I do this Yahoo blogging in the name of fun, to share interesting things, and sometimes to add my flavour / humour / wit to it. I work full time and certainly do not have the time to work on an individual masterpiece of originality that shines in smartness and is outrageously funny. I'm not in the league of professional writers for the time being. I'm here to have fun and to try. To practice, gain experience and to learn from others.

Tuesday 16 January 2007 - 06:17AM (GMT)

I need more fans like you Paused. :X Thanks.

Tuesday 16 January 2007 - 06:29AM (GMT)


speaking of more friends, like Paused...

i think u'r a hunka hunka burning love!

Tuesday 16 January 2007 - 10:13PM (CST)

Thanks Sai!! The more like-minded fans I have the merrier! :-P

Wednesday 17 January 2007 - 04:17AM (GMT)

You've plaguerised me with your bird-love!! :-P

Thursday 18 January 2007 - 11:13AM (GMT)

Thursday, January 11, 2007

The Mid Life Crisis – The Cause of My Quirky Quartz: Testosterone



In a blog I read recently called "Men, men, men" D writes:

"Carl Jung talks about a time in midlife when men and women begin to switch roles, around the mid-forties. While women are just starting to come into their stride, men are slowing down, going "a little soft" as he puts it. Gail Sheehy, author of Passages, among other books, seconds this notion.

Science backs it up. Men lose 1% of testosterone per year starting at age 30 and by age 50 at least half of all men have struggled with erectile dysfunction. In contrast, women's testosterone levels increase while estrogen levels are slowly dropping. Long established "sexual peak" ideas also put men and women at odds, with men peaking at 18 and women peaking at 35.

All in all it sounds like a recipe for conflict. Yet suddenly the notoriously immature middle-aged man dating 20-somethings begins to make a certain kind of sense, surely as much sense as the middle aged housewife's affair with the poolboy... Both men and women are changing and re-evaluating."

D also writes:

"I see blatantly emotional appeals for a relationship at all costs, almost of a poetic quality, that I never noticed before. I see men, grown men, becoming obsessed with a woman. I see men getting cheated on and left. For some reason I never noticed these things going on--in my rush to stereotype, mostly due to being attracted almost exclusively to avoidant men, I never noticed this side of them before. Loving, getting attached, getting rejected, getting hurt."

To this I would like to add that I've seen some men become so obsessed that they go to the lengths of wanting to be ‘enslaved’ to their loved ones. I read somewhere that in BDSM culture men over the age of 35 outnumber the younger males under 35 by six to one and that the proportion of those that are submissive in the older bracket is much higher than in the younger bracket. In the females, the younger ones tend to be submissive while many more of the older ones take a fancy for the dominatrix role… and it’s all to do with the changing of testosterone levels!

Fear not though, this changing of the testosterone levels, really ought to be good news all around. Men coming through their MLC intact should come to realize they now have a better capacity for understanding, sensitivity and consideration. Women can now realize they have the confidence to establish independence and control and enjoy their new found sexual prowess.

For those males who didn’t come through their MLC intact, don’t worry, go see a relationship counselor… and if that doesn’t work… you could try a dominatrix!!

Just kidding about that last option ... No seriously I am

For the article called 'Men, men, men' by D click the link "under the palms".



Comments from Yahoo 360

(7 total)

it's a bit of a cruel joke, don't you think? Men hit their peak around age 18, women sometime after they're 40. Women are hitting their sexual peak, while men are ready for their recliners and the remote control.....

Thursday 11 January 2007 - 08:11AM (CST)

I like how you write, can you invite me as a 360 friend so we stay connected and I can continue reading your blogs

Thursday 11 January 2007 - 09:01AM (PST)

How can you get divorced and married twice in one year ?
In the US it takes 3 months to get divorced .

Thursday 11 January 2007 - 09:02AM (PST)

Lapis, it will be a pleasure to invite you. Technically in the UK it is impossible to divorce and marry twice in one year because if you marry in the UK a divorce cannot even be considered by the courts until 1 year after the date of marriage. In my case I applied for the divorce in November 2005 and it was finalized in March 2006. I officially married Moon in Scotland in July 2006 with most of my family present. Since Moon's family who live in Vietnam could not come to Scotland, we arranged a Vietnamese style wedding celebration in October 2006. And thus I got divorced and married twice all in the same year. ;-)

Friday 12 January 2007 - 12:35AM (GMT)

hillarious, great story Phil, now I understand

Thursday 11 January 2007 - 06:45PM (PST)

Why can’t they all be the same?
Yet, I guess if they were
We’d never notice the ones that are different!

I live for comments, I really do.
Somebody to play my game with me.
How come we always want what we know we can’t attain?

You come across some that can give you everything
Others that give you what you couldn’t find inside the everything
And then…
Sometimes you can find those that give you what you never imagined.!!!

Friday 12 January 2007 - 11:36PM (CST)

Hmmm... I prefered the original plagiarised version. It was far better! ;-)

Thursday 18 January 2007 - 11:15AM (GMT)

Tuesday, January 9, 2007

Goodbye 2006



2006 has been a year of making big changes in my life. Finding a creative side inside that Quartz of mine was one of the key discoveries of this year... I don't know if discovery is quite the right word - I think it's more a realization of something that's always been there in the background. It was there but it was discreetly blended into the rest of my psyche that it wasn't so obvious until I really looked closer and saw it.

Over many years my mind has been moulded to think in straight lines and this is the year in which all of a sudden I seem to have an urge to make those straight lines more crooked. Perhaps it's a side effect of going through a period of an introspective mid-life analytical crisis - A Quirky Quartz...

This was the year in which:

I got divorce, and got married twice…

I finally broke even after years of debt…

I turned 40…

I loss my sister Ann after she had battled with breast cancer for more than 5 years…

I started writing blogs…

I invented Q-ology...

I visited the Great Wall of China…

Conclusion

Life is a weird and strange experience!

In case you’ve been wondering where I’ve been lately…

Moon and I went to the UK for our Christmas vacation. For Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and Boxing Day we stayed at my ex’s place in Wales where we all enjoyed Christmas midnight church service, Christmas Lunch at home and a Medieval Banquet at Ruthin Castle.

I arrived back in Shanghai yesterday and today’s my first day back at work.

Hope you all had a super Christmas and I hope you all have a successful and brilliant 2007 as I am going to have!

Sit back and enjoy the ride as this Quirky Quartz gets into action!


Comments from Yahoo 360

(3 total)

I missed you, lil bro, glad to see you back...

Tuesday 9 January 2007 - 08:51AM (CST)


AWESOMELY Analytically Politically Correct yet Truthfully Soulful BLOG...

I envy You!

Tuesday 9 January 2007 - 09:49PM (CST)

Sorry to be so late with this, but I hope you had a great holiday season. Like you, Bao Anh and I were very busy, mostly visiting kids at the handicapped centers, orphanages and even in the streets. We dressed in red and were often mistaken for other famous personalities (no, not Elvis and yes, I'm implying we are also famous, at least to one another!). We had a great time and seemed to be on the go constantly. The kids outside of our apartment are convinced I am No En (Santa Claus) and Bao Anh is my wife! Woo woo! We followed that up with a trip to Vung Tau and have been laying low ever since-healing for next December's run! Actually, I've been working on a new painting of three boys from Tra Vinh. I also noticed that you lost a sister in 2006, as did I. My sister died in October, as I was on my way to deliver a speech in Phoenix, Arizona during the Vietnamese Autumn Latern Festival. Since this was to raise money and awareness for our kids here in Vietmam, I did what I know she would have wanted me to do...I gave the speech! I wish you and Moon a very Happy New Year-Chuc Mung Nam Moi! I look forward to hearing from you often and hearing about all of your adventures!! I promise to do the same, my friend.

Thursday 18 January 2007 - 06:36PM (ICT)